Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Club Atlético Palermo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Many thanks to frankie for digging for sources. While the club might have met the notability guideline, there is no evidence in this AFD that that can be verified by sources. causa sui (talk) 18:02, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Club Atlético Palermo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't seem to satisfy notability. Divide et Impera (talk) 04:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions.  —Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  —Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 3 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG Stuartyeates (talk) 09:49, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 15:18, 10 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Cannot find any reliable, third-party sources to suggest notability. ItsZippy (talk • Contributions) 17:18, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment English language sources aren't readily available, as far as I can tell. But both the Italian and Spanish language versions of the article are pretty lengthy, so there might be something to this. I'd feel a lot better if someone from Argentina would chime in. (I left a message at the Argentine Wikiproject.) Zagal e jo^^^ 00:02, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I considered !voting keep and adding Template:Expand Spanish on the article to get a translation from the Spanish Wikipedia article. However, it seems WP:CIRCULAR to rely on another Wikipedia article, especially when I am not fluent enough in Spanish to determine if the references are considered reliable.  Another negative is the Spanish article doesnt have many footnotes, relying mostly on External Links. I have no problem if someone has confidence in the Spanish sources and thinks a translation would benefit the English article.—Bagumba (talk) 08:00, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. There isn't much available for notability, but I feel the place is effectively treated as historically significant by the news hits, and these two book hits  suggest the same, and given that the club saw it's prime day during the 50's, there might be some more content available offline. The article from the Spanish Wikipedia is very thorough, but none of the information is supported by the sources (given that there are none). The Italian version is more discrete and better referenced, and had this link  to confirm the club's participation in Primera División in 1920. The club's history as presented by the city's government is very short, but it describes it as having been a precursor in Soccer, "the most outstanding, together with Club Gimnasia y Esgrima, in Basketball", and also the stage for notorious Milonga orchestras — frankie (talk) 15:49, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.