Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Club Dancer 2016


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Club Dancer 2016

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No coverage in reliable sources to meet the general notability guidelines nor does it meet those for films, Opencooper (talk) 02:38, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Opencooper (talk) 02:47, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Opencooper (talk) 02:47, 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. If searching for sources, I'd eliminate the year and add 'movie', but even then what comes up is pretty meager. Article appears to have been created by a WP:COI account, who at the article talk page initially claimed to be the producer. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:18, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * A thriller called "Club Dancer"? Where a guy in spandex dances bad guys to death? NO! I got it! He IS the killer, luring unsuspecting victims to the dance floor, challenging them to a dance-off, and then watches how they die of a boogie-induced heart attack only two minutes into the song! And he has a partner, a lovely woman, whom he uses to entice the victims into the club, but when he kills someone she later discovers to have been her long-lost brother, she changes her mind and cooperates with this young cop, an orphan in exile from Sri Lanka, who takes dance classes and does endurance training (two marathons a week) to prepare himself for the final showdown, which he wins because the Club Dancer has gotten lazy from all his successes and developed a cocaine habit. It's an AWESOME movie. Drmies (talk) 15:41, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GNG and WP:MOVIE. WP:MOVIE requires that WP:GNG is met (it makes exceptions and gives relevant criteria for article subjects that are older films, which this subject is clearly not). WP:GNG is not met due to the complete lack of a significant amount of reliable sources that cover the film in depth and to the point where no original research is required in order to write a full article. The only source I could find is the IMDb page here, and that's it. Hence, this article subject fails WP:GNG (which, in turn, fails WP:MOVIE).  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   21:35, 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.