Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clubroot (musician) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:11, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Clubroot (musician)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Just not convinced of this guy's notability, okay so there are one or two favourable reviews of his albums, but I am not getting "the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician ".  Captain Screebo Parley! 15:46, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 10 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. The coverage found in the previous AfD is sufficient to establish GNG-notability. --Michig (talk) 06:13, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Agree with Michig, notability has already been established. The article needs improvement, but not deletion. — sparklism hey! 10:39, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Michig. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 10:16, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Not to be pedantic, but I beg to differ, two album reviews and the FACT thing that reads like it's just taken from a press release, you can send stuff in to AllMusic so it gets published etc. Although notabilty is not temporary, I do not find that the sources presented at the first AfD are sufficient, two are album reviews where the artist is fleetingly discussed. From WP:NTEMP "While notability itself is not temporary, from time to time re-assessment of the evidence of notability or suitability of existing articles may be requested by any user via a deletion discussion" and further on "In particular, if reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual."
 * I would argue that this person fits the above criteria, maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see "multiple, non-trivial coverage" personally.  Captain Screebo Parley! 19:14, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Understand your point, but IMHO an artist who garners an Allmusic biography alongside album reviews from Pitchfork, Scaruffi , Sputnikmusic , PopMatters , The Needle Drop etc is generally going to meet the requirements of WP:MUSIC.  — sparklism  hey! 10:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, I see that an AllMusic bio is editorial apparently, the only recent review is from The Needle Drop which is apparently a blog/vlog according to Wikipedia, I am still dubitative about their overall notability, I guess let the AfD run its course. Cheers!  Captain Screebo Parley! 10:51, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Sparklism. Bearian (talk) 16:54, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.