Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clue Dungeons & Dragons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Dungeons & Dragons-related products. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 01:50, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Clue Dungeons & Dragons

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable board game SageGreenRider (talk) 02:55, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see any real coverage in reliable secondary sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 03:40, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep if sources can be found, otherwise merge to either Cluedo or Dungeons & Dragons-related products. BOZ (talk) 04:04, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't seem to meet WP:Notability as does the main game. − Gaming4JC (talk) 04:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to one of BOZ's suggestions. Existence warrants a small mention, but not a separate article. And nothing special needing to merge beyond content already there.  野狼院ひさし  u/t/c 11:18, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment: Provided this is not kept, closer should note that several others entries at Cluedo (the best redirect target, IMO) also have separate articles, and perhaps should be dealt with similarly even though not formally bundled into this AfD. Pax 23:41, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 17:06, 13 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹   13:25, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Several other clue variants have pages. Suppafly (talk) 15:55, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * "Other stuff exists" isn't a good argument for keeping it.SageGreenRider (talk) 17:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.