Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clusterball


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 13:57, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Clusterball

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable computer game with no reliable sources to it's notability. Hipocrite (talk) 12:29, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike 14:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep – reliable sources covering the game and  (at least in regards to the iPhone release; more are probably out there). MuZemike 17:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I think that's about a different game, given that it's got a different name, on a different platform and was released 9 years after the game being referred to. Hipocrite (talk) 17:45, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I read both reviews, and it still looks like they're referring to the same game, though given they're different ports. All say that you collect balls and drop them through rings to score. MuZemike 01:37, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article was only edited six times in 2007 and 2008 combined! If that doesn't establish its place in obscurity and non-notability, then I don't know what does. -sesuPRIME talk • contribs 06:29, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Doesn't matter how many times it was edited, or how short it is. It was mentioned in a third party media source, mentioned by MuZemike, and thus meets the requirements for existing.   D r e a m Focus  01:36, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete since there are not the kind of multiple non-trivial mentions in reliable sources that would establish notability for this.Bali ultimate (talk) 16:16, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Extremely trivial real-world coverage in only two sources, which is far from enough to establish sufficient notability. The provided sources don't even seem to cover the game in question so much as an apparent sequel to the game. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 18:21, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep "Clusterball" + "review" + google search = three good sources pop out immediately, now cited. C'mon, this is depressing... Someoneanother 01:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.