Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clyde and Willis (animated series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:09, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Clyde and Willis (animated series)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NTV and the general notability guideline. Out of all sources provided, one appears to be the creator's website and the others don't mention the show at all. A Google search shows that this does in fact exist (and therefore does not qualify for G3 (I believe, please correct me if I'm wrong)), but only on YouTube. No other reliable, secondary sources about this show were found in my search. PROD removed by article creator. Sky Warrior  17:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete As per above plus it's pretty clear that this & multiple related articles by the same creator are WP:COI pieces meant to WP:PROMO this studio after they failed to get a TV deal. JamesG5 (talk) 21:20, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * NOTE - After doing a bit more digging here and at the other article WP:Articles for deletion/Andrew Bernie Wilson this is [redacted] using a game platform to YouTube videos. All the references given for "deals" to buy the show do not check out.  The YouTube channel for the videos has just over 100 subscribers and barely 2000 views.  The new editor below suggesting "keep" shows by his edits he's another Roblox user in the friends group.  This is an amateur project that does not meet WP:GNG. JamesG5 (talk) 15:22, 15 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Sky  Warrior  01:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Animated series has relations with Cartoon Network an undoubtebly notable TV channel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aca rblx (talk • contribs) 13:05, 15 May 2017 (UTC)  — Aca rblx (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * NOTE The above editor campaigning for a delete is making false claims. He suggests that I know andrew which I do not. He is assuming that by the age of the person that the article is about that he is not notable. This is called age discrimination. Also they are participating in subscribercount discrimination. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aca rblx (talk • contribs) 17:28, 15 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete makes no credible indication of notability. Uncle Roy (talk) 11:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * delete per above. This looks like perhaps a Walled garden with a dedicated cadre mustered to argue for keep, w/o any understanding of our notability guidelines. Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:20, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete no references provided for coverage in reliable secondary sources. -- ‖ Ebyabe talk - State of the Union  ‖ 16:33, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete – I can find no coverage in the usual American trade publications, so this is almost certainly non-notable. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.