Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Co-Ed Confidential


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The Bushranger One ping only 04:40, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Co-Ed Confidential

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Insufficiently referenced with unclear notability. Cleanliness (talk) 21:09, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 21:13, 22 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as not notable. Tryphaena (talk) 21:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Is it possible that expand on your WP:JNN?  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notable enough series with 4 season under its belt if you review the gnews and gbook hits. Solution is to start referencing the show not delete it. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:45, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete This is not an appropriate topic, I fully agree with the above statment, Insufficiently referenced with unclear notability. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 04:09, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * To Phoenix B 1of3: "This is not an appropriate topic"? Please read WP:NOTCENSORED. "Insufficiently referenced with unclear notability"? Please read WP:NRVE, WP:ATD and WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:28, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Yup, the article needs work, but improvement is an addressable issue that does not require deletion in its lack As pointed out, sources are available and topic notability requires only the existence of suitable independent, reliable sources, not their immediate citation within the article.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:28, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, not as censorship but due to notability. The only links I can see seem to be TV listings websites. Can't see that it's actually worth fixing this problem on those grounds. Cloudbound (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. A long-running series on a national TV network, and one of the hallmark shows of the "Skinemax" programming slate, this show passes WP:TVSERIES.--Arxiloxos (talk) 21:20, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Clearly notable, a national TV network, four seasons, six compilations, gnews hits, gbooks hits. Insufficiently referenced? Yes, for sure, like The Redd Foxx Show, The Name of the Game, Call to Glory, Life With Lucy, Today's F.B.I., Street Hawk, Crazy Like a Fox and a large bunch of tv-series-articles, at least 50% of total.--Cavarrone (talk) 15:35, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.