Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Co-shoring


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:OR. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:05, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Co-shoring

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Possible original research, no references, almost nothing on Google--Fil e  Éireann 20:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Falls under the category WP:NOTNEO. Tangurena (talk) 21:00, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Its a hellish stupid term I know, but I think it's real. If you do a search on G for co-sharing project development it throws up numerous companies brochures, blogs, support sites which use the term. Seems to be fairly new but now quite common. scope_creep (talk) 23:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * delete Weak article. Vague unsourced woffle with no substantial content or background to it. It's not OR, just because there's no "research" to it.
 * As to NEO though, I've been working on co-shoring IT projects for about ten years. We could use an article on it, but it would be difficult to do one outside of OR. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:37, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete It's real enough, but someone will have to write an acceptable article first.  DGG ( talk ) 03:53, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.