Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoPatient


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR (non-admin closure)  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  16:59, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

CoPatient

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I think that the article would be expanded Shad in Net 01:33, 19 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shad Innet (talk • contribs)
 * I see one iRS attestation of notability (The Oregonian), while the other sources are about capital and "hometown" stuff (or lump stories where this company gets a mention). It's not a clear deletion case, and I would rather err toward keep, but the article needs to be cleaned up. Weak keep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hithladaeus (talk • contribs) 19:37, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The above reason (only local coverage) is an argument for deletion, not keeping. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:39, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Quite right, except that I would consider The Oregonian to be more than local. I understand your point, and I don't feel very strongly about the "keep," but I felt as if this article were qualitatively different from most of the promotional articles and unattested businesses. (I don't know why all these articles tell us how much money a business raised, as if that is an indication of its success. Borrowing money does not mean you're doing your job well, but it must look good to investors.) Hithladaeus (talk) 01:33, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ( Talk ) 14:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ( Talk ) 15:22, 2 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.