Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoSMoS (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:09, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

CoSMoS
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't have the coverage or significance to meet WP:NOTABILITY. 1st AfD was closed without a decision due to lack of participation. This has been stuck in CAT:NN for 12 years now - I hope we can now have enough participants to resolve this, one way or the other. Boleyn (talk) 14:58, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:29, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:29, 15 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Although it was pointed out in the previous AfD that references to CosMos existed in this book, the author of that book worked at her internship in the University of York under Prof. Jon Timmis who is listed as involved in the Project at York. It therefore cannot be considered as intellectually independent. Also, this article descibes CosMos as a "4 year project" which received funding between 2007 and 2011 - yet the official webpage describes it significantly differently. It appears that it isn't a "project" per se but an umbrella term to capture activities used to build out understanding/tools/case studies of complex systems. The website describes it as follows:
 * Drawing on our state-of-the-art expertise in many aspects of computer systems engineering, we will develop CoSMoS, a modelling and simulation process and infrastructure specifically designed to allow complex systems to be explored, analysed, and designed within a uniform framework.
 * At least some of the case studies and tools still continuing up to 2015 at least, based on the last "workshop" listed on the website. I believe that the project did not achieve notability in its own right and some of the case studies, participants and tools may have a bigger claim to notability.  HighKing++ 15:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and HighKing. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 23:06, 17 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.