Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoaXPress


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 16:19, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

CoaXPress

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

A serial communication protocol. Author has likely COI. Previously deleted as spam. No evidence of notability. &mdash; RHaworth 15:37, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * keep - First:I rewrited this article(I removed for example the company names of the standardisation consortium). Second:I think this is an interesting article as it is a communication protocol which is already available on cameras and frame grabbers of different companies. Coaxpress is a protocol with specific connectors,coding,... like USB or firewire but only for a niche-market. (Of course this article can and will be improved, but the topic is interesting and certainly not spam) Xmaillard (talk) 07:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  -- Pcap  ping  21:54, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. No gnews or ynews hits for this term, and no gscholar or gbooks hits either. This may be an important protocol in the future, but right now it is not.  Wikipedia is not the place to garner attention for a new protocol.  See WP:SOAP points 1 & 4. Joshua Scott (talk) 02:54, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.