Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coach (2016 TV series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Coach (TV series). Courcelles (talk) 20:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Coach (2016 TV series)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Television project in development that is uncertain to ever enter production; standalone article fails WP:CRYSTAL, and this show's development process is not notable. Section at Coach (TV series) discussing proposed continuation is suitable. -- Wikipedical (talk) 09:24, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia does not keep articles about every television project that enters the production pipeline — we keep articles only about the ones that actually come out the other end as completed projects that actually get scheduled and aired somewhere. A brief subsection in the article on the original series is all that's needed here. Bearcat (talk) 08:54, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:48, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Coach (TV series). Some of this information is already in the article, but I do think that it'd benefit from having its own subsection, if only for ease of locating the information about the failed project. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:10, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Concur with merge/redirect. It was picked up for series, but it was one of those shows that was canceled before airing an episode (it may have actually been in production at the time depending on who is reporting). If it were a show in and of its own right, not tied to another, it'd be a marginal case for keeping on its own, but considering it's a revival of an existing series, it just makes sense to have the proposed revival described in the context of the original series. J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 21:29, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to the target article stated by User:Tokyogirl79. Now, I proposed to make a new section per  as a target link.  ApprenticeFan  work 08:08, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.