Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coalition For Change (civil rights organization)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:01, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Coalition For Change (civil rights organization)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Even when the organization and its founder are mentioned, the actual topic of coverage is something else entirely, usually discrimination or a particular suit. The coverage doesn't amount to coverage substantially about this organization. Also, most sources I'm finding strike me as less than reliable (press releases, human interest) to support the magnitude of importance apparently claimed, especially in past versions of the article. For example, this rather promising CBS url leads to a piece authored by a "C4CFED." All that reliable sources indicate as far as WP:CORPDEPTH is this organization exists. This article was apparently created by the organization's founder,. JFHJr (㊟) 07:05, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment — As a side note, the organization hosts a list of names that was used to support WP:BLP-offending content: see here and here. It shouldn't bear directly on deletion, but it does give an indication of the encyclopedic value of the organization's own publications. JFHJr (㊟) 07:29, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I prodded this earlier, because having looked I could find no reliable third party sources. It was deprodded, but no real solid sources have been found.--Scott Mac 13:44, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 00:29, 27 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter  (state)  @ 11:20, 2 December 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete Has zero or 1 wp:notability-suitable sources, depending on how you view that one story on that website. There is no coverage on the organization other than it's stated intentions and on the person that started it. The article also seems evasive on a wide range of areas.....this could be a one person "organization" from all that has(n't) been sourced and established in the article. North8000 (talk) 12:09, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.