Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coast (clothing)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Could use more references like The Telegraph but needs TLC and refs primarily, not deletion. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:09, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Coast (clothing)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Trivial coverage. Fails WP:GNG.  Greenbörg  (talk)  16:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:07, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Coverage has been much expanded since nomination. Due to the company's choice of a common word for their brand it has been a bit tricky to find sources. There is now enough independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, WP:SIGCOV, to pass WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 10:54, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Page seems to be fixed, a little more TLC can be done when sources are found. 47.208.20.130 (talk) 19:01, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.