Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coastal Construction Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:39, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Coastal Construction Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article for non-notable company. The references are either local references to minor philanthropies, or routine articles about specific construction projects or pure press releases such as the laudatory "interview" in ''Southeast Construction", a regional trade magazine.

Promotional aspects are the list of routine types of construction undertaken, which belongon the website or an advertisement, and a list of the routine normal philantropies of any business enterprise.  DGG ( talk ) 22:19, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete no evidence of meeting WP:CORP Secret account 17:12, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:16, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔  23:35, 10 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as non notable company. →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  00:57, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:34, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.