Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cobra (programming language from Squeaky Duck) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 04:25, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Cobra (programming language from Squeaky Duck)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lack of notability. The tag of notability has existed since December 2009. I searched for sources but I found none. Previous nomination happened in Articles for deletion/Cobra (programming language) (the article has been moved). Ricvelozo (talk) 20:53, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:31, 30 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Zilch on the 3rd party front. Shame, as it sounds like an interesting language for a rather different market from usual, but without some coverage elsewhere, WP is not an appropriate location for first publishing. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:38, 30 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources as required by WP:GNG. Googling suggests they don't exist.  It seems possible that this product may become notable in the future but WP is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL.  Msnicki (talk) 22:47, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:GNG. —Ruud 23:00, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment; if deleted, then as part of cleanup, Cobra (programming language from Cobra Language LLC) should be renamed to Cobra (programming language); it has its awkward name only due to the presence of this article. I have insufficient knowledge of this article's subject to form an opinion as to its notability, and express no !vote. TJRC (talk) 23:09, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.