Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cocafulluckyar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Cocafulluckyar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable island previously deleted via PROD. CoolSkittle (talk) 13:59, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I PRODed this because it fails WP:V, I could find no reliable sources at all.--Pontificalibus 15:10, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm pretty inclusionist regarding named geographic features, but there has to be some sourcing evident even for me. In this case (despite the nomination phrasing), this is about a beach on Kiltan Island. The island is real, and well-documented. I have no reason to believe that the beach on Kiltan isn't called this by at least some people. But there are simply no sources. The only non-mirror hit that Google can find (under either spelling or the Malayalam name, and including Google Books) is this very non-RS website. Personally, I wouldn't be surprised if this was the local name for the island's long beach; I can find essentially no sources that name any geographic features on Kiltan. And so whether this content is accurate or not, WP:V is the controlling policy. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 16:00, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:38, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:38, 4 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete I can't find any reference to Cocafulluckyar on even the Lakshadweep UTA's website. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 23:57, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I though the name was a hoax when I saw it. Could be a local name for a small area but it has to be verifiable from some RS for inclusion.  Such an RS just doesn't seem to exist.  I could not find one. If this was previously deleted and re-created, do we need Salting? Britishfinance (talk) 17:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.