Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cocaine: One Man's Seduction


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:16, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Cocaine: One Man's Seduction

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No refs on the page for many years. I'm seeing mentions and database entries but nothing substantial which would meet the notability standards JMWt (talk) 10:34, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Television. JMWt (talk) 10:34, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep.
 * 1) Entry in Hooked in Film: Substance Abuse on the Big Screen (2019);
 * Mentions in various books:


 * 1)  ;
 * 2), (etc.);
 * various reviews including:


 * 1)
 * 2) and last but not least,  this one (in the New York Times).
 * Among other things. Notability is very clear and I'm inviting User:JMWt to withdraw this nomination.- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  20:43, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * only the first and last of those could be considered substantial coverage in a RS, the others are simple mentions or in a blog.
 * The first seems on point, more than half a page in a published book. The NY Times piece is in a section of daily reviews of TV movies, so arguably is just run-of-the-mill coverage which could be found of many TV movies.
 * At best that's borderline. I'll let other editors consider whether the offered sources are enough for notabllity. JMWt (talk) 23:02, 25 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep, plenty of hits at newspapers.com, including and   Donald D23   talk to me  23:37, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the newspaper and book coverage identified in this discussion. The NYT piece is somewhat critical of the film so counts as an independent review and its not run of the mill as they don't review everything that is on, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.