Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cochicken


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 06:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Cochicken

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Neologism, no citations as to importance Brianhe (talk) 07:52, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I was unable to find any reliable references, nor are any provided in the article. It's simply a reference to one episode of a viral marketing campaign. Furthermore, nothing sets this particular episode apart from the rest; without a reference to confirm the Today Show claim, it's simply another non-notable, unverifiable neologism. &mdash; Ledgend  Gamer  09:18, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - The host of the YouTube show admits on the episode that they made it up.  smithers  - talk  17:48, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious WP:N failure. Should have been prodded instead. Dlabtot (talk) 18:19, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It was prod'ed on 2/11 so could not be resubmitted. - Brianhe (talk) 20:59, 14 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:MADEUPINONEDAY and WP:N. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  02:34, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect or delete. There are a few sources mentioning Cochicken as a popular segment of Will It Blend?; the Today Show appearance is mentioned by a Business Week reporter and possibly elsewhere (the Google News summary of the Star Tribune article listed on that page mentions it, but the article is at a pay site so I can't verify the content of the full article).  But I still don't see any need for an article separate from Will It Blend?  I thought User:Colonel Warden's redirect solution was an appropriate one, but I suppose deletion is also a workable solution since a search of the word "cochicken" should still lead the user to the Will It Blend? article.--Arxiloxos (talk) 21:47, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.