Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cock tease (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:32, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Cock tease
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I don't see a possible way to expand this into an encyclopedia article. Some of the "Use in media" section could be used as examples on Wiktionary. Apocheir (talk) 22:46, 16 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:45, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Apocheir (talk) 22:46, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even in the scholarly sources (stable links) which were apparently the reason it was kept in the previous AfD (and were quietly removed by an IP in the meantime), the term is used, not mentioned. No significant coverage is demonstrated. Nardog (talk) 23:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. Wikipedia is also not the Urban Dictionary, and standards have changed since 2006 when the article was first created. (Quick search of sources surfaces a 2008 adult film by that name, and articles that use the term in passing. Trying to build an article on the basis of the coverage available is by definition OR.) Cielquiparle (talk) 14:06, 29 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.