Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cocksmith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was that I'm not qualified to euthanize anyone, but I can delete this article. - Mailer Diablo 04:04, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Cocksmith
Non-notable term. A Google search reveals only two hits, both as slang terms in online dictionaries. No other references either on regular websites or in media. Delete Atrian 05:42, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a neologism. NatusRoma 05:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a dictionary. --Walter Görlitz 06:05, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It definitely appears on more that 2 pages on Google, but that doesn't change the fact that it's just another neologism, with silly original research. —  The KMan  talk  06:54, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * What I meant was that there are only two hits within the context of this page. There are other unrelated hits for the same word. Atrian 07:18, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Fair enough :D&#160;—  The KMan  talk  07:20, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a neologism. Rather an archaism.  Probably better suited to be under Cocksman anyway.  And almost certainly a dicdef. Fifelfoo 07:22, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOT a dictionary. --Terence Ong 13:49, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT the urban dictionary. Although, perhaps the word is really another word for a chicken farmer? Peyna 16:50, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP is not urbandictionary, leave thosed "dicdef"'s there. --Lightdarkness 17:38, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not encyclopaedic. Latinus 00:01, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Euthanize the Author, Delete the Article. That has got to be the most inane drivel I've ever spent 3 seconds of my life trying to read. --Agamemnon2 06:54, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Maybe Not Euthanize Me. I understand it's a neologism, I will transfer the article to Uncyclopedia.com.  In defense, it is a phoenomena.  Russel Crowe has been called one.  But the term is still in progress. --Lordmemnon 3:47 25 January 2006
 * Delete and transwiki to uncyclopedia. Stifle 14:22, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.