Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cocktailrobot

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Paul August &#9742; 02:57, September 8, 2005 (UTC)

Cocktailrobot
Neologism with only very limited use, referring to a form of art, which, however, isn't entirely clear from the article. Please take a look at the related pages Shifz and Magnus Wurzer, too, about which I haven't quite made up my mind yet. However, this one should be deleted. Martg76 02:43, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Sadly, the Cocktailrobots are now all in RA (Robots Anonymous). If the claim to international relevence on Magnus Wurzer cannot be verified then I would see no problem with all three of these articles being deleted &mdash; if this art movement were to take off, an article could always be created later on, eh? Perhaps some Wiener Wikipedians could indicate whether this group has gotten much attention there? --DavidConrad 03:30, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Cocktailrobot isn't even a neologism, it's just two words run together. Take the links away and it's just dicdef, anyway. Shifz at least seems to have done something of note. My vote is to Delete Cocktailrobot and Magnus Wurzer as nn, Keep Shifz as an art group. --Outlander 21:22, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dicdef at best, not an encyclopedia article.  I think it's very questionable whether this is a word, since in most contexts it would seem to be two words simply run together per Outlander. Quale 17:35, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.