Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coco (2016 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. This close is without prejudice against a speedy renomination (although the preferred time would be after the actual release of the film). &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 04:41, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Coco (2016 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Aside from some rapper in the main role, I can't find the relevancy of this film. No release date (or someone confirming is indeed coming), or useful information of the plot there. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  00:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment. I don't think that principal photography has begun. This source from back in January says that the film is supposed to release in 9 days but I don't think I see anything about it filming. At the very least I'd recommend that this AfD stay open until release day. So far I'm leaning towards a merge and redirect to RZA. It has a fairly notable cast and while that doesn't give notability, it does make me hopeful that if/when this releases it'd gain notability, enough hope to recommend that we leave the article history intact. I'm going to hold off on an official position until closer to the release date, although offhand I don't think it's going to release any time soon. This is usually when the marketing would hit a fever pitch and its absence is fairly telling that the film is likely still in the pre-planning phase, which happens with movies. It's why films rarely get articles prior to confirmation of filming. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:22, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * OK, this mentions that there was filming in July of last year, so that's promising. It's possible that this may release soon after all. We'd need something a bit more about the filming to really suggest a keep per NFF, though my position on keeping the article history is still the same. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:25, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Filming has concluded. It has a notable director, a notable cast (all of the main cast have articles) and a major company, Lionsgate, is distributing it. JDDJS (talk) 03:08, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep for now -I agree with JDDJS, only reason Im skeptical is that there are sources that say it was supposed to hit theaters on March 11, 2016. Since there hasnt been any press on why that didn't happen or the current status, I think it's too early to say a film with a notable cast and director should be deleted.Burroughs&#39;10 (talk) 21:23, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: It's been almost 2 weeks since the movie should've been released, and according to some searches I did, it is "post production" but I think it's just maybe WP:TOOSOON. Maybe userfy/drafterfy? MrWooHoo (talk) 01:50, 25 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.