Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coco Rocha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 07:13, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Coco Rocha

 * — (View AfD)

No assertion of notability. -→ Buchanan-Hermit™ / ?! 03:12, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Was on the cover of Italian Vogue, lots of people talking about her on message boards, seems somewhat notable. &mdash; Chowbok  ☠  04:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Use of the word "supermodel" is a pretty strong assertion. Subject seems to be a lot more well known than even the most notorious ANTM contestant, with plenty of credits per her website which check out, on the surface. 37,900 Ghits but there are a lot of blog entries amongst those, but plenty of hits in other languages (Spanish, italian, japanese, chinese). The Phoenix cites her as being an "international model" Ohconfucius 04:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. May become more notable in near future. Needs stub tag, though, or expansion . Realkyhick 06:32, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Her page has no independent sources and reads like an advert.  She may be notable but G11 (delete spam) is applicable.  Eluchil404 07:43, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * keep please this is not spam at all really it is a stub about a notable canadian supermodel with reliable sources too Yuckfoo 09:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article only has two unique sources cited, and both are also listed as external links. -→ Buchanan-Hermit™ / ?! 09:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * there are now 4 unique sources cited please feel free to help add more and make the article better Yuckfoo 10:07, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.