Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cocobat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-11 00:48Z 

Cocobat

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Found this needing to be wikified, but is it worth doing or should this be deleted? BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 10:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep but this article needs attention from somebody who knows Japanese. Most corroborating sources appear to be in that language.  They do have an Allmusic entry, though I'm not sure that satisfies WP:N. ObtuseAngle 16:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * They have multiple album releases on the Toy's Factory label. Toy's Factory is mid-major, with at least two chart-topping groups on their label (Mr. Children and Yuzu (band)).  I think that is enough to meet WP:BAND. Neier 10:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I would agree; it's hard to source articles about Japanese acts. ObtuseAngle 20:29, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no actual content on this article worthy of its own article. Even if it were to be updated to meed wiki formatting standards, the page would not be purposeful. Jtg920 17:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Kusunose 08:00, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep iff cleaned up  by the end of this AFD. This band may merit an article per the sources above if it is cleaned up.  I'll take a swing at it now ... -- Black Falcon 20:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, I have significantly changed the article. I removed all of the tracklists that cluttered the page and added a half-detailed history section for the band.  I have left the cleanup tags on the page so that further improvements can be made by someone more knowledgeable and/or interested in the subject, but think it qualifies for inclusion at this point.  -- Black Falcon 21:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It looks much better now then when I nominated it, as it is, keep. --BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 19:54, 9 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.