Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coconut (project) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 23:53, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Coconut (project)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable project. Only source is the project's website and a press release on the Reuters website marked "Reuters is not responsible for the content in this press release". Does not meet WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 12:24, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions.


 * Delete. Yet another EU research project.  There's an offsite canvassing project dedicated to creating articles for these without regard to whether they are actual encyclopedia subjects or not.  The uncommunicative jargon and wild optimism about what they hope to achieve is also typical of the too-familiar genre: ...aims at defining a framework for the integration of formal verification and system design. Embedded systems, possibly with mixed continuous/discrete domain, are a special focus of the project. Tools for formal verification, correct-by-construction synthesis, mapping between hybrid and discrete domains, and property analysis will be researched, developed or improved, and integrated into a design flow.  If you can explain in real English what this project is about, based on that extremely abstract and baffling description, you win a gold star.  I'm not even sure from that text whether computers are involved.  I suspect so, though.  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:56, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: Another non-notable software. Joe Chill (talk) 22:56, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The last AfD closed as keep because of two reliable sources which just so happen to be dead now. Joe Chill (talk) 23:39, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.