Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Codan-lingyun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted (CSD G12) by Jimfbleak. Non admin closure.  " Pepper "  @ 16:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Codan-lingyun

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional in tone; does not support the subject's notability. ZZArch talk to me 09:47, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep a major rubber hose manufacturer. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:51, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I could not find any reliable third-party source that indicates notability. Take note that No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization is exempt from this requirement, no matter what kind of organization it is. … "Notability" is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance." No matter how "important" editors may personally believe an organization to be, it should not have a stand-alone article in Wikipedia unless reliable sources independent of the organization have discussed it. (from WP:CORP) ZZArch  talk to me 11:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I've speedied as a copyright infringement from the company's website, spammy in tone anyway  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  13:56, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.