Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Code Monkeys (2014 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 02:14, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Code Monkeys (2014 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources found. No confirmation for anything in this article. De-prodded so I'm taking it to AfD. Jarkeld (talk) 20:40, 12 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete likely a hoax. Cast listed includes actors committed to current productions and have nothing anywhere for the actors stating they are in this project. Also fails WP:NFF as, along with nothing at all that mentions this project, there is, of course, no source that it has commenced principal photography. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:04, 12 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL Seasider91 (talk) 22:59, 12 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree with above: most likely a hoax; couldn't find any references, much less reliable. Might be a small production, but I doubt it has those actors who are currently filming already. Vacation 9 23:11, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Absolutely not, WP:CRYSTAL, and in the United States I think the former G4 show of the same name holds dibs on the title, wouldn't be this.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:32, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Very likely a hoax, and even if it's not, it's still a crystal ball article. Lugia2453 (talk) 02:25, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-verifiable. — Ed! (talk) 03:47, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 06:06, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 06:06, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 06:06, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 06:06, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 06:06, 13 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can find nothing to suggest that this is even real, let alone passes WP:NFF. I hate to throw the word "hoax" into this, but considering the amount of hoax film/TV articles that have been added to Wikipedia in the last few months, I think that this is a potential hoax.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:16, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete If nothing can be verified/sourced, then it lends itself to being a hoax.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 10:01, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete for now without prejudice for undeletion or recreation once this purported Thomas Romain and Tania Palumbo project can be properly sourced.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:42, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 *  Delete Debug - Unless I see coverage in reliable sources that this will be made, then it smells of crystal and hoaxiness. If it's in development hell, shouldn't there be more coverage about it? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:31, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete unreferenced WP:CRYSTAL speculation. RadioFan (talk) 00:59, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as hoax. Mewtwowimmer (talk) 06:14, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.