Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CodebaseHQ


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Jake   Wartenberg  19:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

CodebaseHQ

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable software product lacking GHits of substance and lack any GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:PRODUCT and WP:COMPANY. ttonyb1 (talk) 15:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Speedy removed by IP which should not be allowed IMHO. Jujutacular talkcontribs 15:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, A7. Removing a speedy template normally calls for an edit summary at least, especially from an IP. Sorry, speedy decline rationale on talk page, although at no point in the edit summary does it say "speedy declined", which is poor form at best. Delete at whatever speed, not notable. Hairhorn (talk) 15:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:41, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 22:36, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, non-notable. --GreyCat (talk) 18:22, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.