Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Codendi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 15:20, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Codendi

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Promotion for non-notable software product; article by single-issue user who was blocked for spamming. Article gives no significant sources, nor was I able to find any such coverage. Haakon (talk) 21:26, 18 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Haakon (talk) 21:28, 18 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete a7 product written by spammer. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
 * Delete - I cannot find significant coverage to make a notability claim. --16x9 (talk) 22:27, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: an open-source collaborative development platform .... Its features include bug tracking, versioning integration (Subversion and CVS), document/requirements management, reporting, tests, and various plugins. In other words, this is about the business of supervising computer programmers.  - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:39, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Evil bastards! Don't forget to vote on livigent, which is a lot worse! ;) Pcap ping  22:25, 22 December 2009 (UTC)\
 * Well, yeah ... and neither the nomination nor any of the previous comments mentioned the sort of product it was. I just supply the missing context. ;) - mSmerdis of Tlön (talk) 18:15, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. It looks like an internal open source product from Xerox Research Europe. . The 2008 award appears genuine, but I don't think it adds much to notability given the restrictions: best open source produced by large company, uh! Plus, it looks like a closed club thing, since the sponsors are other big companies. It doesn't look like anyone else cares about this product, and the other ghits on the Lutèce d'Or award seem marginal, e.g. , ... Pcap ping  22:42, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.