Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Codesign studio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:21, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Codesign studio

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that it meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 20:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:28, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:28, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment – Here are two sources:, . North America1000 20:37, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * More likely delete - The two sources above are from News and frankly it seems like the only ones because Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary found nothing else. Considering this is a fairly recent company, it's unlikely there's that much coverage from the past years. SwisterTwister   talk  16:17, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - In addition to the two sources above (which both cover the same story from May 2015), here's an interview at SMH's "The Zone" in 2012: . But for me, a mention in the news every couple of years doesn't make the company notable. Adpete (talk) 00:43, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 15:55, 12 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.