Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Codespring


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 18:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Codespring

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

More or less spam; most of the links are thoroughly commercial, and those that are not merely mention the company of passing. Having notable clients does not automatically make one notable; neither does having a booth at an expo. Oh, and User:Szilagyiz is the creator; guess who's their contact person. Why, Szilágyi Enikő, of course! - Biruitorul Talk 18:38, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * CallForPrices: they seem to have overlooked this :) Delete. Nerdseeksblonde (talk) 21:06, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

The status of Microsoft Gold Partner should be another good reference: | MS Solution Finder. Szilagyiz (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:57, 5 October 2009 (UTC). There will be other notability issues mentioned in the course of the week. --Szilagyiz (talk) 14:01, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:03, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

Delete No assertion of notability. I would argue that the Microsoft Gold Partner Certification does not imply notability as seen by the requirements to attain such a status on Microsoft's web site: https://partner.microsoft.com/40013031. Furthermore the article reads more or less like an advertisement. Also possible COI issue as noted by nom. --Aka042 (talk) 16:49, 12 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - no coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 17:08, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.