Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Codimg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  14:44, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Codimg

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This does not even come close to meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRIT. Barely any coverage in reliable sources. MarioGom (talk) 12:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Software. MarioGom (talk) 12:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Not to forget how many promotional sources it has. Orientls (talk) 14:05, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Medicine, Psychology,  and Spain.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  21:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.