Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coding by Comrade Reguspatoff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  21:50, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Coding by Comrade Reguspatoff

 * del. While reguspatoff is a venerable joke, but (a) its application to coding is even not a neologism (b) the article is factually incorrect. "Reguspatoff" is American joke, not Soviet. mikka (t) 02:57, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsense. --Ter e nce Ong 04:04, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete but funny, moved copy to BJAODN. Oscar Arias 05:06, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. The humourous aspect must be too subtle for me MLA 09:57, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete silly, unencyclopedic - and not really that funny folks. [[image:VirtualSteve.png]] V  i  r  tual  Steve  12:00, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nonsense and not funny Funky Monkey 17:10, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, funny because it's not true. ProhibitOnions 20:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nonsense. &mdash;Eternal Equinox | talk 21:51, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Pavel Vozenilek 22:32, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.