Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Codrin Arsene


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  Sandstein  05:58, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Codrin Arsene

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not quite a random blogger, but definitely below the bar of notability. For sources, we have a blog post, another blog post, three newspaper articles he wrote (1, 2, 3), a news portal that makes no mention of him, an interview and a list of speakers at a forum. None of these is especially significant in terms of the coverage it provides, or even acceptable for usage. Biruitorul Talk 14:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 21 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per this interview by Evenimentul Zilei and the 12 other Romanian language RS listed on Google News. (Individual article quality varies from a mere mention to a couple paragraphs about Arsene.  Collectively, the sources indicate that the GNG is met.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThaddeusB (talk • contribs) 23:08, April 21, 2012‎
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 28 April 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete It's quite likely that, in the future, Arsene's contribution will be more notable (and I'm actually a fan of his writing!), but for now the sources are virtually all primary. Dahn (talk) 12:55, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Σ  τ  c . 00:25, 6 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.