Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cody Miller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. per consensus and as an unsourced BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Cody Miller

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I cannot find any sources that back up the info in the article. The article sounds like it was written by the subject of the article (and probably was based on the edit history). Even so, the claims in the article are that Miller is semi-pro wrestler, and has never reached the highest ranks in the wrestling world. Angryapathy (talk) 18:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  -- Danger (talk) 18:31, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  -- Danger (talk) 18:31, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- Danger (talk) 18:31, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn't meet WP:ATHLETE or WP:GNG. Nikki  ♥  311   21:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless I'm reading this wrong, this is somebody's persona in various online wrestling games (This appears to be the main 'championship' he's competed in). See also NGPW. In principle that could be notable, but there's nothing out there to say that this is anything more than someone's avatar. 4u1e (talk) 19:20, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete There's so much wrong with the article it's hard to find a starting point--lacks notability, sources, autobiographical, perhaps fantasy. Papaursa (talk) 20:18, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources given, google doesn't return any relevant results. Even if we could find sources, the vast majority of the article is completely useless anyway. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 00:54, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G3 (hoax articles). A quick internet search for the "promotions" in which he has competed verifies that these are online wrestling simulations. This wrestler is simply not real. GaryColemanFan (talk) 15:34, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Note to self: Read the RfD before blowing 20 minutes copyediting an article.  Oh well. Joe407 (talk) 19:08, 8 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Also, the article history appears to confirm WP:COI editing. Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 02:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable, unsourced, unencyclopedic--total waste of space. Bjenks (talk) 06:43, 10 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Came to this by way of copy-edit backlog drive. But this autobiographical, unsourced, POV article about a non-notable professional wrestler is nearly a perfect example of the side benefits of a copy editing backlog drive. Note to Joe: I feel your pain. David in DC (talk) 13:43, 10 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete, came to this from the copy-edit backlog as well. When the sanctioning body's redlinked, it doesn't look good. Daniel Case (talk) 20:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.