Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cody Posey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Cody Posey

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article should be deleted per WP:NOT and WP:ONEEVENT. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 00:37, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. unless there's an appropriate target for a rd. JJL (talk) 01:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Transwiki to WikiNews if useful, delete otherwise  Thin boy  00  @191, i.e. 03:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Every event does not have lasting notability.Steve Dufour (talk) 04:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete indeed, for all the reasons given above. Drmies (talk) 05:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep sufficiently notorious crimes are notable. To murder several members of ones immediate family counts as notorious. ONEEVENT is for events of borderline notability--otherwise, for example, no airline crash would be notable.  DGG (talk) 06:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep – As DGG pointed out. Correspondingly, international coverage as shown here: Russian –  German –  Italy –  British – ]. Similarly, Cody Posey is involved in a wrongful death lawsuit against the designers and marketers of  Grand Theft Auto, as shown here ].  In addition, the Mr. Posey is the subject of Scholarly works, as shown here .  Likewise, I do not believe this is the last we will here of Mr. Posey.  Upon his release, there will additional media coverage.  Thanks - ShoesssS Talk 15:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 10:37, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 10:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 10:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per significant coverage in reliable sources, and notability. WP:BLP1E is for cases which are significantly covered in the media, but still lack sufficient notability to warrant inclusion. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  22:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep for the same reasons DGG and Shoessss noted. Bill (talk 23:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.