Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cody Reinberg (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 14:43, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Cody Reinberg
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

See Articles for deletion/Cody Reinberg (2nd nomination), now making a separate nomination. Ymblanter (talk) 15:29, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:33, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:33, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 16:27, 3 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - A player of the third-tier semi professional, USL Second Division league, a non-WP:FPL. Fails WP:NFOOTY. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 16:55, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing approaching significant coverage. In the previous AfD, it was asserted that there was some coverage of this person, which is true—there are one or two news articles   —but namechecks like that do not come anywhere close to counting towards sigcov. There is just no way to write an encyclopedia article from those sources without making our own content. The presumption of significant coverage in reliable sources would be discredited at this point even if he was a professional player that got such a presumption in the first place. Alpha3031 (t • c) 06:47, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:28, 4 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - what a clusterfuck of an AFD journey. In the middle of the first discussion the nominator decided to try and change the notability parameters, and the second discussion was a wholly inapproproriate bundle which was procedurally kept. Rant over. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and no evidence (despite all the time at AFD for sources to be found) that WP:GNG can or will be met. GiantSnowman 08:38, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I did not decide to try and change the notability parameters. That was done by community consensus, and initiated by another editor. Ironically, both GS and I supported the change; one of the few things we've agreed on. Leviv&thinsp;ich 22:58, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete – Fails NFOOTY, fails GNG. Leviv&thinsp;ich 22:58, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails GNG. It always failed NFOOTY (as FPL is not part of NFOOTY, but merely a separate essay) - however NFOOTY is of little consequence for a very modern player (in an era with online sources in English available) for which the presumed notability can be simply checked vs. available sources (contrast this with Articles for deletion/Josep Raich - a Spanish player in the 30s and 40s for which NFOOTY carries weight). Regardless - it is rather evident that coverage for this individual does not rise up to SIGCOV. Icewhiz (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Low level, modern-era, minor league soccer player, who played professionally in a country where the sport is not popular. Fails WP:NFOOTY, WP:GNG, and WP:BASIC. Ejgreen77 (talk) 23:48, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.