Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cody Rowlett

__NOINDEX__ 
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 00:09, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Cody Rowlett

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable actor. His acting credits (from IMDB) all show him as an uncredited extra, with unnamed roles like "Groomsman" or "Student". Natg 19 (talk) 16:11, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 16:11, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 16:11, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 16:12, 6 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. As the nominator asserts and I also found with my own research, no sources suggest roles (on camera or off) of any note. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   17:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: as per @Non-Dropframe. Quis separabit?  18:19, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - While I'm not certain, this looks like it's a 'too soon' case since his career is just getting going. I also agree with the above comments. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 18:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - Non notable actor, No evidence of notability, Fails NACTOR & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 18:42, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. None of these roles are substantial enough to be considered notable roles. The only ones that are listed anywhere show that they were stand-in, non-named roles, so I have to assume that the non-listed ones are the same and are likely uncredited parts. This actor just isn't notable yet. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:23, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * SNOW delete as there's nothing to suggest better. SwisterTwister   talk  07:07, 7 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.