Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cody Vatcher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 01:47, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Cody Vatcher

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. The first ref is a opinion piece written by the subject. Beyond that, there is a little local routine coverage expected of any municipal election candidate. MB 01:44, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. MB 01:44, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. MB 01:44, 24 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete candidates for council are absolutely never notable for such, and he has no other claim to notability. This is a new low in how unnoable a politician is.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:03, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. The topic fails WP:NPOL. While I wouldn't call this a "new low" per se, I do agree with John Pack Lambert. Utopes (talk) 02:14, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Failed candidate for the 2018 Peel Region municipal elections, Ontario. No claim of national or international coverage of the subject or anything else that would make the subject more notable than other situated candidates. --Enos733 (talk) 05:17, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. People are not notable just for running as candidates in elections they did not win, Peel Regional Council is a level of office at which even winning a seat would still not have made him "inherently" notable even if he had won, and two pieces of routine local campaign coverage and a primary source table of election results is not even close to enough sourcing to deem him as passing WP:GNG in lieu of having to pass NPOL. Bearcat (talk) 11:12, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, but with the caveat that the original creator of the article be offered the article code to take with them to another service or their personal web hosting service. It's an otherwise well written biography, certainly better than some quasi-notable or even notable biographies. So, consider my !vote to be delete with a short-term (up to 30 days) draftify allowing the article creator to take the article elsewhere.Doug Mehus (talk) 05:19, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Living BLP (wait, that's redundant), no sources. Even if that's fixed, he's still non-notable. SportingFlyer  T · C  12:02, 27 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.