Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cody Walker (actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Subject has received significant coverage from multiple reliable sources, played a major role in notable movies.. (non-admin closure) JAaron95  Talk   14:32, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Cody Walker (actor)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Page contains no verificaiton of their notability, as outlined for a biography of a living person. One film role does not verify them enough to constitute their own Wikipedia page.  livelikemusic  my talk page! 12:42, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - he's received significant coverage for his stepping in to film scenes for his brother to finish Fast & Furious, and working for his brother's organization. —Мандичка YO 😜 12:55, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to Furious 7. Blatant failure of all of the criteria at WP:NACTOR. Sock   ( tock talk)  13:07, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep – I know it's obvious, but it must be said that every article starts off small, and I agree that the younger Walker has received enough coverage that he deserves his own article. Plus, with him possibly joining Fast & Furious 8, it would be more than appropriate.  4TheWynne (talk) (contribs)  13:21, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - I expanded article considerably. He has gotten a lot of press and he's already filming another movie. —Мандичка YO 😜 13:34, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I would've said Weak keep because the article is neat and sourced and it's very possible he will build more roles and while I wish him the best, I'm not sure if there's much for solid independent notability (potentially vulnerable to BLP issues also) so it may be best to redirect to Paul Walker (preferrable than the others). While a News search finds results, again, there's likely not much for solid independent notability at this time. SwisterTwister   talk  05:58, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep His role in USS Indianapolis gives him 2 roles of some significance, so he passes the notability guidelines for actors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:17, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:22, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:22, 14 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep This actor seems to be a rising star, with a fair bit of news coverage. Mewtwowimmer (talk) 21:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep He now has 2 notable roles. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 05:07, 17 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.