Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coghlin Companies, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:06, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Coghlin Companies, Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article doesn't appear to be overly promotional, but it is an obvious WP:COI; the cause for this AFD is that the company does not assert any importance. Why are they notable? It just seems like WP:MILL here, posting a page in efforts to get more notice. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 16:53, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

I can add some things about Coghlin that make it noteworthy. I will collect some information in a way that is appropriate for Wikipedia and keep the not overly promotional tone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coghlin (talk • contribs) 17:04, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, weakly. While this business may have been around since 1885, they are at least currently a contract manufacturer; what they make is not sold under their own brand, or designed by them.  Unless this was different in the past, it seems unlikely that this business has any historical, technical, or cultural significance. Google News archive and Books turn up only routine coverage of transactions and directory listings. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:45, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. Toddst1 (talk) 23:31, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.