Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cognac Gautier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 00:51, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Cognac Gautier

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I would have put a CSD notice in a second on this article, but anything that has to do with Louis XV might justify giving this article a fair discussion. Rain bow  Dash  11:47, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The writing style of the article verges on the obscene but there seem to be some passable sources, eg – ╟─ Treasury  Tag ►  You may go away now.  ─╢ 12:55, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep was going to claim it appears notable per independent coverage, but one of the links was a blacklisted site, and whether the other meets WP:RS is debatable. GBooks result given above is enough for a weak keep  Je b us 9 8 9  ✰ 18:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:53, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:53, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:53, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 14:51, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Baseball   Watcher  03:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Google books has several references, such as, , , . look WP:RS  enough to me (it says it's got a medal in 1867). Regards, Comte0 (talk) 11:36, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.