Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:21, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies

 * – ( View AfD View log )

To quote from the article body: "The Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies is a peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research in the Interdisciplinarity. ... The journal is abstracted and indexed in: I hardly think anything more needs to be said. JBL (talk) 20:17, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Publons
 * Crossref
 * ORCID
 * Academia.edu"
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. JBL (talk) 20:17, 26 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:NJOURNALS, indexed nowhere selective. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:39, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of indexing. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:49, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:NJOURNALS --Whiteguru (talk) 22:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Misses NJournals and GNG. Sounds predatory, but not bad enough to have generated coverage that would satisfy GNG. Note that Publons, despite being Clarivate owned, is suspect as it even includes OMICS titles and allows publishers to give the most egregious promotional descriptions of their rags. --Randykitty (talk) 22:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Also looking at Special:Contributions/Research531... there's likely WP:PAID going on here. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:32, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, almost certainly. --JBL (talk) 22:32, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Misses WP:NJOURNALS by a wide margin. (Boasting of being "indexed" in Academia.edu is like boasting of existing.) Paid editing would be unsurprising. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 00:13, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note I believe that the editor is a representative of OMICS (OMICS representatives, paid or otherwise are community banned) and I have given a final warning. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  04:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * See also this. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 07:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Note from Research531 First of all, i am not related or representative of OMICS Group, Secondly i am not even related to the journal on which i wrote the article. I am just the beginner and want to contribute to wikipedia. But i was wrong, wikipedia is full of people who instead of encouraging people, they will discourage and not only discourage but also criticize for the things which new users never commit. Hence, i am really sorry that i tried contributing to wikipedia and you can delete my article. Thanks for letting me know that their is no scope for new editors or users. Not only this, but just now i realized that all my previous genuine edits were also removed without any reasons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Research531 (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.