Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cogsley Farnesworth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. --Angelo (talk) 22:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Cogsley Farnesworth

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable commercial product. This article has been unreferenced for more than six months. Listing at afd after contested prod. prod was removed after adding a single reference with no footnotes. The offered reference appears to be self-published. Mikeblas (talk) 21:51, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of sources. Fee Fi Foe Fum (talk) 05:43, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - lacks media coverage Addhoc (talk) 20:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: For both of the reasons above. --SimpleParadox (talk) 20:51, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I looked for sources for the article content and did not find anything but lists of of failed motorcycle companies. Fails WP:V "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it."Jeepday (talk) 04:39, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.