Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coherent Breathing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 19:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Coherent Breathing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appear to be a single persons alt med idea. No evidence of wide spread acceptance. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:08, 26 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence whatsoever that this meets Wikipedia notability guidelines. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:32, 26 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Possibly notable but needs significant work if kept. Google books search yields a number of hits. This article would need a rewrite especially with regard NPOV. And no I'm not volunteering to do this. Matthew Ferguson (talk) 23:39, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: ...hum, search for "coherent breathing" on GoogleScholar seems mainly to return other (scientific) usages of this page name. A relevant consideration here perhaps? 5.80.198.100 (talk) 12:35, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes seems a different usage.... Matthew Ferguson (talk) 02:19, 28 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Advertising for some guy's machine. JFW &#124; T@lk  20:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Seems very much like an advertisement, almost zero independent sources as most of the references were written by the inventor. Unable to find notable independent sources. - Pax  Verbum  21:42, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. No independent verification. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:39, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 30 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete because we don't publish original research or non-notorious fringe theories. Bearian (talk) 11:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, per Berian, etc. 5.80.198.100 (talk) 20:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.