Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cohocton, New York (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Cohocton, New York (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:2DABS. Town is at primary age and appears to be genuine WP:PRIMARYTOPIC - more coverage, more page views, bigger place. Boleyn (talk) 08:38, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as the prodder. My prod was removed due to concerns that there's not a primary topic. However, that question was already decided a while back here. -- Tavix ( talk ) 12:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as unnecessary disambiguation page per established consensus. Smartyllama (talk) 17:37, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, a hatnote is more than enough. Cavarrone 06:55, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment I am not sure that the town here is primary. I hope that you all are aware that in New York "town" means "township", and is not a settlement.  See the extended and inconclusive discussion mentioned above here.  I agree that the dab page is not needed, but for most purposes, other than location, the eponymous villages tend to be primary. --Bejnar (talk) 18:59, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I also see Cohocton, which another dab page.  That one seems more useful, and this one just duplicates that.  -- RoySmith (talk) 10:46, 16 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.