Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coimbatore railway Division


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Coimbatore Junction railway station. This AfD suffers from rather low participation. The delete arguments are strong, but there are also good arguments that this is a notable subject. Hence I am redirecting this to Coimbatore Junction railway station so that the article can easily be restored if more substantial sourcing can be found. Randykitty (talk) 10:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Coimbatore railway Division

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article fails WP:ORGIND and WP:FAILCORP as there is NO such thing as "Coimbatore railway Division". The article quotes some references which has no direct or indirect connection with the subject provided. And all this sounds to be original research, not verifiable. Sources : 1, 2 & 3. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 19:08, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:09, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:10, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - unacceptable original research Spiderone  10:32, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Coimbatore Junction railway station. There may well have been a Coimbatore railway division prior to 1956 so I wouldn't say this is WP:OR or not verifiable. Someone with access to documents on the Indian railways prior to that date may well find significant coverage. However unless detailed sources are forthcoming on this historical division, or on a proposed new division of the same name, we don't have enough to support a separate article at this time.--Pontificalibus (talk) 14:21, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:57, 29 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947(c) (m) 05:48, 6 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Night  fury  13:53, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - it appears to have existed. There are 69 or 73 divisions (depending on which part of Zones and divisions of Indian Railways you read), so while I'm no Indian train expert despite having traveled several times on one, a division appears to be considered important enough to warrant its own article.  This doesn't seem to be a case of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, and notability isn't lost, so weak keep. TimTempleton (talk)  (cont)  22:06, 20 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.