Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coining, inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 22:03, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Coining, inc.

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of or evidence of notability. Dicklyon (talk) 17:26, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Claims it is world largest in the kind. Laudak (talk) 18:06, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  --  The  left orium  17:56, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:NN. Also fails WP:V/WP:RS, only primary sources provided. No source to assert it is actually the largest in it's kind. --> RUL3R *flaming 18:10, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No reasons to doubt the official statement of the company either. It is not mom and pop's shop. It is an international operation. Laudak (talk) 18:22, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Of course there are reasons to doubt, you can't trust a company who claims they are the biggest in their buisiness, it's all a marketing stunt. Or would you get Comcast just because they claim their cable is the best and has the bigger benefits? --> RUL3R *flaming 19:02, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * When a company says it is best, it is unverifiable subjective opinion. When a company says it is biggest, it is verifiable objective claim. Laudak (talk) 16:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * And what is their source? How are they able to claim that? Where is the verifiablily other than in their own claims? It lacks secondary sources. --> RUL3R *flaming 16:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Gnews provides 11 hits, first two are dead ends, next six are a different company, ninth is a pay-review (which is likely good), 10/11 are others. At this point it fails WP:V/WP:RS. - SpacemanSpiff Calvin&#8225;Hobbes 18:49, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.