Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coinkite (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. slakr \ talk / 14:08, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Coinkite
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails to meet notability standard. The first AfD decision was reached on January 24 to delete, and the article was recreated on January 27.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 February 9.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 06:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: The "first" nomination was a group nomination making this the second. There were some issues with transclusion which have now been resolved. Stalwart 111  07:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep: Coinkite has received non-trivial and verifiable coverage from most major Ontario news outlets and from national sources. The previously deleted article was poorly sourced and included original research, but I have rectified this. The current article meets the criteria set by Notability_(organizations_and_companies) Jasonid (talk) 17:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The citations are great, but did not support most of the information in the article (I removed unsourced info). Per notability, Toronoto Star gave the subject significant coverage. Cbc.ca, CHCH, and Globalnews.ca have very minor mentions of Coinkite (two or three short paragraphs each), and Bitcoin Magazine mentions it trivially as one of four companies in a single sentence. Agyle (talk) 21:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete as recreated material with little or no changes whatsoever. Citation Needed  &#x007C;  Talk  12:23, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.